Press Freedom

The Paperwork He Never Got: Jamal Khashoggi's Last Errand

Jamal Khashoggi walked into the Saudi consulate in Istanbul to collect a document so he could remarry. A fifteen member team was waiting for him. Years of trials, pardons, and an intelligence assessment later, the man who ordered his death has faced no direct sanction.

Amnesty Freedom August 27, 2026 10 min read

Hatice Cengiz stood outside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on the afternoon of October 2, 2018, holding her fiancé's two mobile phones, exactly as he had asked her to before he walked inside. He had gone in once before, on September 28, and come out again, having first, by his own account to friends, sought assurances about his safety before returning. This time he told her that if he did not come out, she should call the authorities. The consulate's public hours ended at three thirty that afternoon. By four o'clock, she had reported him missing. Jamal Khashoggi never came out.

The errand itself was almost banal. Khashoggi, a fifty nine year old Saudi journalist who had spent his career at Al Madina, Arab News, and Al Watan before going into self-imposed exile in the United States and writing columns for The Washington Post, needed a document from the consulate certifying that he was no longer married, so that he could marry Cengiz, a Turkish academic he had met at an Istanbul conference earlier that year. He had been banned from publishing and appearing on Saudi television before leaving the kingdom. His final column, on the state of free expression in the Arab world, ran in the Post two weeks after his death, under his byline, because he was no longer alive to write another.

Fifteen men on two jets

A team of fifteen Saudi operatives had flown into Istanbul earlier that day aboard two private jets. Investigators later identified members of the group, including an intelligence officer named Maher Abdulaziz Mutreb, a forensic specialist named Salah Mohammed al-Tubaigy who headed Saudi Arabia's Scientific Council of Forensics, and a man dispatched to wear Khashoggi's clothes and walk out of the consulate afterward as a decoy. What happened to Khashoggi inside the building was reconstructed piece by piece over the following months, through Turkish surveillance, forensic leaks, and international investigation: he was killed and his body was dismembered, and it has never been recovered.

Agnès Callamard, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, spent months investigating the killing and delivered her findings in June 2019 in blunt terms. Khashoggi, she concluded, was "the victim of a premeditated extrajudicial execution, for which the State of Saudi Arabia is responsible." Fifteen Saudi state agents, she wrote, had "acted under cover of their official status and used state means to execute Mr. Khashoggi," in an operation that involved "elaborate planning" and "extensive coordination." Her report identified six separate violations of international law, from the prohibition on extraterritorial killing to the misuse of a consular mission, and recommended a full criminal investigation reaching Saudi Arabia's most senior officials, explicitly including the crown prince.

What American intelligence concluded: A declassified assessment released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in February 2021 stated plainly that "we assess that Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman approved an operation in Istanbul, Turkey to capture or kill Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi." The operation, the assessment noted, included seven members of the crown prince's own personal protective detail.

A trial, a pardon, and two acquittals

Saudi Arabia held its own trial, out of public view, and reached a verdict in December 2019: five defendants were sentenced to death, three others received prison terms totaling twenty four years for covering up the killing, and two senior officials widely understood to have overseen the operation, royal court adviser Saud al-Qahtani and former deputy intelligence chief Ahmed al-Assiri, were acquitted or released for lack of evidence. In May 2020, Khashoggi's children issued a formal pardon to the five men facing execution, sparing their lives under Saudi law's provisions for victims' families to forgive killers in exchange for restitution. A final ruling that September fixed non-appealable sentences of between seven and twenty years for the eight men still convicted.

Turkey, which had never been permitted to prosecute anyone connected to a killing committed inside its own territory, indicted twenty Saudi nationals in absentia in March 2020, including al-Qahtani and al-Assiri, and opened its own trial that summer. It went nowhere. In April 2022, an Istanbul court transferred the case to Saudi Arabia altogether, effectively closing the only proceeding in which the men already acquitted at home might have faced fresh scrutiny. The Committee to Protect Journalists condemned the transfer the day it was announced.

A United States intelligence assessment concluded the crown prince approved the operation that killed him. No government has sanctioned the crown prince directly for it.

The lawsuit that immunity ended

Cengiz and the advocacy group Khashoggi had founded before his death, Democracy for the Arab World Now, brought a civil suit in federal court in Washington seeking to hold Mohammed bin Salman accountable. In November 2022, the Biden administration filed a formal notice asserting that the crown prince, who had recently been named prime minister of Saudi Arabia, was entitled to head of state immunity, a status that shields sitting heads of government from civil suits in American courts regardless of the underlying allegations. Judge John D. Bates dismissed the case that December. He did not dispute the merits: he wrote that there was "a strong argument that plaintiffs' claims" were credible, and described the allegations against the crown prince in similar terms, but concluded that immunity nonetheless required dismissal. The two officials named alongside him, al-Qahtani and al-Assiri, were separately dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction.

What remains, more than seven years after the killing, is an unusually well-documented case with an unusually incomplete outcome. A UN investigator, a US intelligence community, and a Saudi court, in its own limited way, all concluded that a group of state operatives dismembered a journalist inside a diplomatic building. The men who carried it out have faced sentences that were negotiated down by a pardon. The man identified by American intelligence as having approved the operation has faced none.

Khashoggi's own organization has continued pressing for a fuller accounting in the years since his death. Democracy for the Arab World Now, the advocacy group he founded shortly before he was killed, joined the Knight First Amendment Institute in October 2022 in filing a Freedom of Information Act request seeking the full, unredacted version of the American intelligence assessment on his killing, portions of which remain classified. Sherif Mansour of the Committee to Protect Journalists said around the same time that Khashoggi's "legacy will forever haunt his killers," a line that has aged, in the years since, as much like a hope as a prediction. Hatice Cengiz, who was widowed before she ever married the man she had waited outside the consulate for, has continued to press the case publicly, testifying before lawmakers and international bodies about a killing that, for all its documentation, still has no one meaningfully held to account at its top.

Selected sources

  1. Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, "Khashoggi Killing: UN Human Rights Expert Says Saudi Arabia Is Responsible for 'Premeditated Execution,'" June 19, 2019.
  2. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, "Assessing the Saudi Government's Role in the Killing of Jamal Khashoggi," declassified February 25, 2021.
  3. "Assassination of Jamal Khashoggi" and "Jamal Khashoggi," Wikipedia, accessed 2026.
  4. "CPJ Condemns Decision to Move Jamal Khashoggi Murder Trial From Turkey to Saudi Arabia," Committee to Protect Journalists, April 7, 2022.
  5. "CPJ Condemns Biden Administration Decision That Saudi Crown Prince Has Immunity in U.S. Khashoggi Lawsuit," Committee to Protect Journalists, November 18, 2022.
  6. "CPJ Disappointed by U.S. Appeals Court Ruling in Jamal Khashoggi Lawsuit," Committee to Protect Journalists, August 27, 2021.
  7. Memorandum opinion, Cengiz et al. v. bin Salman et al., U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, December 6, 2022.
  8. Reuters and Associated Press wire reporting on the Saudi trial verdicts, December 2019 and September 2020.
← All publications Support this work